Overview
Security as a program, not a project.
Industry data is unambiguous. IBM's 2024 Cost of a Data Breach report puts the average breach at $4.88M and 277 days from initial access to containment. Verizon's DBIR keeps stolen credentials and unpatched edge devices in the top two causes year after year. The defenders that hold up under that pressure share one trait: they run security as an ongoing program tied to measurable risk, not a yearly tooling refresh.
We build security programs around the NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 (Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover), threat-inform them with MITRE ATT&CK, and layer in Zero Trust principles (NIST SP 800-207) so identity becomes the new perimeter. Every control we recommend maps to a regulation or a real adversary technique — not a feature gap on a tooling slide.
Whether you're chasing SOC 2 Type II, HITRUST, PCI-DSS v4, FedRAMP, or just a defensible answer the next time the board asks "how exposed are we?", we'll give you the gap analysis, the roadmap, and the team to close it.
Engagement at a glance
- NIST CSF 2.0 gap assessment in 3 weeks
- SOC 2, HITRUST, PCI-DSS, FedRAMP readiness
- 24×7 SOC capability — co-managed or built
- IR retainer with named responders
$4.88M
Avg breach cost (IBM 2024)
277 days
Mean breach lifecycle
68%
of breaches involve a human element (DBIR)
6 functions
NIST CSF 2.0 — every control mapped
What we deliver
A complete security capability, in pieces or as a program
Strategy & GRC
NIST CSF 2.0 / ISO 27001 / SOC 2 gap assessments, risk registers, policies, and the board-level reporting that keeps the program funded.
Application Security
SAST, DAST, SCA, secret scanning, and threat modeling integrated into CI. Penetration testing against OWASP Top 10 + ASVS. Shift-left, finally for real.
Cloud Security
CSPM, CWPP, KSPM, container and serverless hardening. CIS benchmarks enforced via IaC. Continuous compliance, not point-in-time.
Identity & Zero Trust
SSO, MFA, conditional access, privileged-access management, and the architecture (NIST SP 800-207) to replace network trust with identity-based authorization.
SOC & Threat Detection
SIEM/SOAR build-outs, EDR/XDR deployment, detection engineering against MITRE ATT&CK, and 24×7 monitoring — staffed or co-managed.
Incident Response
IR playbooks, tabletop exercises, retainer with hourly response SLAs, and forensics when the worst happens. Lessons folded back into detections.
How we work
A phased, outcome-driven approach
Assess
NIST CSF gap, asset inventory
Architect
Zero-trust, controls roadmap
Implement
Controls, tooling, IaC
Detect / Respond
SOC, IR, hunt
Verify
Pen-test, red team, audit
Standards & toolchain
Mapped to the standards your regulators already accept
Program framework
ISMS certification
Trust services criteria
Card data environment
PHI safeguards
Federal cloud baseline
Threat-informed defense
AppSec verification
Outcomes
What good looks like
MTTD
Hours, not days
MTTR
Containment under a day
Audit findings
Trending down, not stockpiling
Vuln backlog
SLA-tracked, by severity
FAQ
Common questions
Industries we apply this in
Need a candid view of your exposure?
A 30-minute conversation with our security lead. We'll tell you where the realistic risk is — and what 90 days of focused work would change.
